Design-Information-Modeling for Kit-of-Parts Architecture π§©
semio is the toolchain for designing modular architecture βοΈ
Rhino, SketchUp, 3ds Max, Blender, β¦
A 3d tool π
In semio you link 3d-models π
AutoCAD, DraftSight, LibreCAD, β¦
A CAD tool π
In semio you link dynamic blocks π¦
Revit, ArchiCAD, Vectorworks, BricksCAD, BlenderBIM, β¦
A BIM tool π§±
In semio you link instances of your own types πΏ
Grasshopper, Dynamo, GenerativeComponents, Sverchok, β¦
A node tool π¦
In semio you link the input with the output βοΈβπ₯
IFC, Speckle, BHoM, β¦
A data tool π
In semio you link design knowledge π
Hypar, Viktor, Fusion, β¦
A parametric tool ποΈ
In semio you link static designs π©»
Wasp, Assembler, Monoceros, ComputerGeneratedArchitecture β¦
A solver tool π°
In semio you link precise pieces πͺ‘
OpenSCAD, CadQuery, Fornjot, β¦
A scripting tool π
In semio you link ports visually π±οΈ
Illustrator, AffinityDesigner, InkScape, β¦
A vector tool βοΈ
In semio you link drawings πͺ
EnergyPlus, TRYNSIS, Modellica, β¦
A simulation tool βοΈ
In semio you link models and results π’
Autodesk Construction Cloud, Bimcloud, Bentley Infrastructure Cloud, Git, Nextcloud, β¦
A CDE tool βοΈ
In semio you link urls π
Design-Information-Modeling for Kit-of-Parts Architecture π§©
semio is the toolchain for designing modular architecture βοΈ
In other words:
semio is built on top of the following premises:
The reason why computer science is so successful is because all of its core is open-source π€
Big IT-companies have realized that an open core is the best way for an industry to grow π
The monetization shouldnβt happen on the core technology but on the services around them π°
As customers we pay for:
We donβt care about the underlying:
Most servers in the world run on Linux π§
Software companies of the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry have made the mistake to compete on the core technology instead of the services around them β
If you design unique atmospheres by hand drawn sketches, eager to find the right shape based on surfaces with one-of-each-kind morphology, then you should stick to your 3d tool β
If you design floor plans, sections and elevations by moving lines and hatches around, analyzing contours then you should stick to your CAD tool β
If you design storeys, walls, windows, slabs and roofs by moving them around, changing individual dimensions of those, then you should stick to your BIM tool β
If you design high-resolution blobs by sophisticated rules, statistical noise, intersection-based entropy, then you should stick to your solver tool β
If you design modular systems by iteratively developing typology based on metrics, then you should use semio β